weekly reel January 13, 2019

Bonjour bonsoir, interwebs. In my ears this week, Matchess.

The Rafter by Matchess

The Rafter by Matchess (bandcamp.com)

On the news,

weekly reel January 06, 2019

¡Feliz año nuevo!, folks. And music, with Aaron Martin.

Touch Dissolves by Aaron Martin

Touch Dissolves by Aaron Martin (bandcamp.com)

Around the interwebs,

weekly reel December 23, 2018

Ho ho hey ho, frendz. Music, with grack thany.

ㅂㅂ by grack thany

ㅂㅂ by grack thany (bandcamp.com)

On the news,

weekly reel December 16, 2018

HelloooOo. Music: David Dominique is amazingly jubilant and whatever and sounds a bit like: "Let's go here. Here too? Sure why not? And here looks fun too, well yes here too then".

Mask by David Dominique

Mask by David Dominique (bandcamp.com)

News:

weekly reel December 09, 2018

¡Hola! y music, friendo. A delicious acoustic Suspiria, Beats & pieces big band, and a new flowy K.A.A.N.

Thom Yorke - Open again (Suspiria Radio Session) (youtube-nocookie.com)

ten by Beats & Pieces Big Band

ten by Beats & Pieces Big Band (bandcamp.com)

Subtle Meditation by K.A.A.N.

Subtle Meditation by K.A.A.N. (bandcamp.com)

Around the interwebs,

weekly reel December 02, 2018

Hello frendz. 🎶 with the fantastic soundtrack of the curious, beautiful & relaxing Engare game, and Bugge Wesseltoft & Prins Thomas.

Mim Rasouli - Narenj (Engare Soundtrack) (w.soundcloud.com)

Bugge Wesseltoft & Prins Thomas

Bugge Wesseltoft & Prins Thomas (bandcamp.com)

Newsnewsnews:

weekly reel November 25, 2018

Hi nerds! This week's music by Decanted Youth, in which Justin Frankel (of Nullsoft & WinAMP / Gnutella / Reaper / Cockos fame) plays:

Decanted Youth - Live Red Hook Open Studios - Nov 11 2018 (youtube-nocookie.com)

On the news,

  • Scott Alexander / SSC: The economic perspective on moral standards.
  • Simon Sinek: Most leaders don't even know the game they are in, on millenial workers, management, empathy. Thx bro.
  • Colling Morris: Are pop lyrics getting more repetitive?, a question answered using ... data compression! Cool.
  • [fr] Bure : le zèle nucléaire de la justice , ou comment le gouvernement français utilise contre une poignée d’écologistes tout l’arsenal de surveillance anti-terroriste. Via Nitot.
  • Kottke: Chinese scientists are creating CRISPR babies.
  • Tech:
    • Facebook is a heap of organizational garbage; pick your language:
    • Camille Fournier: I hate manager READMEs, 👍.
    • Bloomberg: Beijing to judge all residents based on behavior by 2020.
    • Ben Wander's quest to become a household name, thx Heinz.

      "I think a lot of people know really famous directors for film, really famous authors. Games don't really get that. Coming from AAA, I get it -- we made games with 300 people, right? It's not one person. But especially if you're an indie game maker, either yourself or with like a really tiny group of people, I think there's no reason your name shouldn't be on the front of the tin."

    • TNW: It takes 3 times more energy to mine Bitcoin than gold.
    • Last but not least, NLR interviews Richard Stallman and it's a good one with interesting socio-political angles. On trust:

      [MIT lab leader] Marvin Minsky didn’t like having doors locked, because he had a tendency to lose his keys. So the doors to the Lab and all the offices inside it were always open. There were no passwords for the time-sharing system. There was no file protection—literally: anybody could sit down at any console and do anything. [...]

      The point is that when people share a computer, either they do so as a community, where they trust each other and resolve disputes, or it’s run like a police state, where there are a few who are the masters, who exercise total power over everyone else. [...]

      Our way of dealing with kids coming in over Arpanet was to socialize them. We all participated in that. For example, there was a command you could type to tell the system to shut down in five minutes. The kids sometimes did that, and when they did we just canceled the shutdown. They were amazed. They would read about this command and think, surely it’s not going to work, and would type it—and get an immediate notification: ‘The system is shutting down in five minutes because of . . . ’

      [Then] there was always a real user, who would just cancel the shutdown and say to that person, ‘Why did you try to shut the machine down? You know we’re here using it. You only do that if there’s a good reason.’ And the thing is, a lot of those people felt outcast by society—they were geeks; their families and their fellow students didn’t understand them; they had nobody. And we welcomed them into the community and invited them to learn and start to do some useful work. It was amazing for them not to be treated as trash.

      On ethics:

      Interviewer: One thing that’s striking about that culture—which is legendary in the history of computing—is that it flourished in an institution largely funded by the American Defense Department. Do you find it paradoxical that this sort of freedom could develop under the carapace of the Pentagon?

      RMS: It’s paradoxical, but it actually makes perfect sense. They wanted to fund some research. They didn’t need to make it be done by jerks and downtrodden people—they just wanted it to get done. During the seventies, a number of the hackers at the ai Lab were bothered by the fact that it was funded by the us military. I thought that what mattered was what we were doing, not where the money came from, and at some point I reached a conclusion that funding from business was much worse.

      I: Worse than funding from the military?

      RMS: Much worse, because the businesses would try to restrict the use of what you did.

      I: Nevertheless, this was the state that was bombing Vietnam.

      RMS: Yes, it was. I was against the Vietnam War, just like everyone else in the Lab, but we weren’t helping them bomb Vietnam. Our work wasn’t particularly military, or even likely to be used in the short term. For instance, Greenblatt did a lot of work on chess programs; I mostly worked on improving various system programs—I developed the first Emacs text editor during that time.

      On the political inclinations of free software:

      I: How is the free-software movement related politically to other issues—does it have any natural allies?

      RMS: Free software combines capitalist, socialist and anarchist ideas. The capitalist part is: free software is something businesses can use and develop and sell. The socialist part is: we develop this knowledge, which becomes available to everyone and improves life for everyone. And the anarchist part: you can do what you like with it. I’m not an anarchist—we need a state so we can have a welfare state. I’m not a ‘libertarian’ in the usual American sense, and I call them rather ‘antisocialists’ because their main goal is a laissez-faire, laissez-mourir economy. People like me are the true libertarians. I supported Bernie Sanders for President—Clinton was too right-wing for me—and the Green Party.

      I: Would it be quite right to say there’s no anti-capitalist dynamic to free software? After all, capitalism proper involves excluding most of the population from means of production, and free software makes such means readily available to anyone. Market exchange is another matter, and could also characterize libertarian socialism, for example.

      RMS: As I understand the term capitalism, it doesn’t necessarily mean that there are quasi-monopolies or oligopolies that politically dominate the world. I do condemn the current system of plutocracy very strongly. When I talk about capitalism, I mean private business. There is a difference between the economic system that the us has now and what it had in 1970. There are two different forms of capitalism, you might say—this one I call extreme capitalism, or plutocracy, in which businesses dominate the state. I’m definitely against plutocracy, but I don’t wish to identify capitalism with plutocracy, because there are other forms of capitalism that I have seen in my life. Basically, businesses shouldn’t decide our laws.

      I: So your political orientation would be to some kind of social democracy with a mixed economy?

      RMS: Yes. But that’s economic; and my political orientation is democracy and human rights. But to have democracy means the people control the state, which means the businesses don’t. So, in terms of economy, yes, I favour having private businesses. I don’t think state restaurants could have made the meal we just had.

      On AI "data-race" and its compatibility with a privacy-respectful society:

      I: It’s often argued now that attempts to deter American corporations from massive data collection, in the name of privacy or civil liberties, will allow China to win the new ‘space race’ in machine-learning and artificial intelligence. What’s your response to that?

      RMS: Freedom and democracy are more important than advancing technology. If China and the us are in a race for Orwellian tyranny, I hope the us loses. Indeed, the us should drop out of the race as soon as possible. Our society has been taught to overestimate the importance of ‘innovation’. Innovations may be good, and they may be bad. If we let companies decide which innovations we will use, they will choose the ones that give them more of an advantage over us.

      I: A complementary argument is that Silicon Valley may have the advantage over China in terms of innovation, but that the next stage in AI will be about implementation—the sheer amount of data an organization can run through the algorithms, and the scale of its processing power—where China has the advantage of a population four times greater than the us. (This seems to be the claim of Kai-fu Lee in AI Superpowers.) How do you view these developments? What are the implications in terms of, first, software freedoms, and second, civil liberties?

      RMS: Such AIs will work for companies; their use will be to help companies manipulate people better and dominate society more. I think we should restrict the collection of data about people, other than court-designated suspects. If that holds the companies back in developing AI techniques to help them dominate society, so much the better.

weekly reel November 18, 2018

YO! UP! MUSIC! TAKE SOME TERA MELOS, 👍👍👍 Sam.

X'ed Out by Tera Melos

X'ed Out by Tera Melos (bandcamp.com)

And on the weekly news,

weekly reel November 11, 2018

Hey ho; music with mouse on the keys.

tres by mouse on the keys

tres by mouse on the keys (bandcamp.com)

Around the interwebs,

weekly reel November 04, 2018

Bonjour bonsoir, frendz. This week's 🎶 is a fun cover by Hot 8 Brass Band.

Hot 8 Brass Band / Joy Division - Love will tear us apart (youtube-nocookie.com)

On the news,

  • SSC / Scott Alexander: Sort by controversial. 👏👏👏.
  • Tech:
    • Logic / Astra Taylor: The automation charade, via l'excellent [fr] Repères 04 d'Atelier10.

      The problem is that the emphasis on technological factors alone, as though “disruptive innovation” comes from nowhere or is as natural as a cool breeze, casts an air of blameless inevitability over something that has deep roots in class conflict. The phrase “robots are taking our jobs” gives technology agency it doesn’t (yet?) possess, whereas “capitalists are making targeted investments in robots designed to weaken and replace human workers so they can get even richer” is less catchy but more accurate.

      Capitalism needs workers to be and feel vulnerable, and because automation has an ideological function as well as a technological dimension, leftists must keep intervening in conversations about technological change and what to do about it. Instead of capitulating to the owning class’s loose talk of automation as a foreordained next phase of production, we should counter with demands that are both visionary and feasible: a federal job guarantee that provides meaningful work to all who want it or job sharing through a significant reduction in the workweek. When pundits predict mass unemployment following a robot takeover, we should call for collective ownership of the robots and generous social benefits detached from employment status, including pushing for a progressive variation of a universal basic income under a rallying cry that updates the 1970s socialist feminist slogan to Wages for All Work—not just the work that bosses recognize as worthy of a meager paycheck.

    • TechCrunch: Tim Cook on the ‘data industrial complex’.
  • 💩😷⚠ Donaldese:

weekly reel October 28, 2018

Hey. Music, with Thom Yorke's Suspiria, Aaron Martin, and Matchess.

Thom Yorke - Suspirium (youtube-nocookie.com)

Thom Yorke - Open again (youtube-nocookie.com)

Thom Yorke - Unmade (youtube-nocookie.com)

Thom Yorke - Has ended (youtube-nocookie.com)

Touch Dissolves by Aaron Martin

Touch Dissolves by Aaron Martin (bandcamp.com)

The rafter by Matchess

The rafter by Matchess (bandcamp.com)

News:

weekly reel October 21, 2018

Bonjour bonsoir, m'sieurs dames. 🎶 avec Feu! Chatterton.

Feu! Chatterton - Grace (youtube-nocookie.com)

Around the interwebs,

weekly reel October 14, 2018

Hey frendz. Music, with the Emily Haines-esque raw pop of Kristin Hersh.

Wyatt at the Coyote Palace by Kristin Hersh

Wyatt at the Coyote Palace by Kristin Hersh (bandcamp.com)

Internews:

weekly reel October 07, 2018

Hola. This week's music is Hampshire & Foat.

The Honeybear by Hampshire & Foat

The Honeybear by Hampshire & Foat (bandcamp.com)

On the news,

weekly reel September 23, 2018

Bonjour bonsoir, and music with deafheaven.

Ordinary corrupt human love by deafheaven

Ordinary corrupt human love by deafheaven (bandcamp.com)

News:

weekly reel September 16, 2018

Yes! No! Maybe! Hello, friends. Musique, avec un nouveau Grand blanc.

Image au mur by Grand blanc

Image au mur by Grand blanc (bandcamp.com)

On the news:

  • [fr] Standblog : La démission de Nicolas Hulot.

    Au-delà de l’organisation de l’Etat, ce qui cloche, ce qui nous mène dans le mur et que les chefs d’Etat doivent corriger de toute urgence, c’est le modèle économique dominant. Pendant que « la planète est en train de devenir une étuve, que nos ressources naturelles s’épuisent, que la biodiversité fond comme la neige au soleil », Emmanuel Macron, Edouard Philippe comme tous les dirigeants de la planète, pensent croissance, PIB, relance de la consommation…

    Bref, dixit Hulot, « on s’évertue à entretenir voire à réanimer un modèle économique marchand qui est la cause de tous ces désordres ». Et alors que « l’enjeu écologique est un enjeu culturel, sociétal, civilisationnel, on ne s’est pas du tout mis en ordre de marche pour l’aborder comme cela ».

  • Kottke: In praise of public libraries.

    Your time at the library comes with absolutely no expectation that you buy anything. Or even that you even transact at all. And there’s certainly no implication that your data or your rights are being surrendered in return for the services you partake in.

    This rare openness and neutrality imbues libraries with a distinct sense of community, of us, of everyone having come together to fund and build and participate in this collective sharing of knowledge and space. All of that seems exceedingly rare in this increasingly commercial, exposed world of ours. In a way it’s quite amazing that the concept continues to persist at all.

  • [fr] De bons articles d'Agnès Giard récemment :
  • SSC / Scott Alexander: The omnigenic model as metaphor for life.

weekly reel September 09, 2018

Hey ho, long time no see. Music, with the relaxing bleeps of emancipator.

Baralku by emancipator

Baralku by emancipator (bandcamp.com)

Around the wild wild interwebs,

weekly reel August 19, 2018

Hola, frendz! Good 🎵 this week: discovered the bright & spacious jazzy prog of I Think You're Awesome, the Portishead-esque vibes of Oracle Hysterical, and the rhythmic sax of Roller Trio.

Bootlegs No.2 @ Ambassaden 30/04/13 by I Think You're Awesome

Bootlegs No.2 @ Ambassaden 30/04/13 by I Think You're Awesome (bandcamp.com)

Hecuba by Oracle Hysterical

Hecuba by Oracle Hysterical (bandcamp.com)

New Devices by Roller Trio

New Devices by Roller Trio (bandcamp.com)

News:

  • Kottke: The carrot is not important; chasing it is and I've never had a goal.
  • New No’s by Paul Chan, written after US' 2016 election:

    No to racists
    No to fascists
    No to taxes funding racists and fascists

    No mercy for rapists
    No pity for bigots
    No forgiveness for nativists
    No to all those

    No hope without rage
    No rage without teeth
    No separate peace
    No easy feat

    No to bounds by genders
    No to clickbait as culture
    No to news as truths
    No to art as untruths

    No anti-Semitic anything
    No Islamophobic anything
    No progress without others
    No meaning without meaning

    No means no
    No means no
    No means no
    No means no

  • Grandmaster Flash hacked his first mixer using parts from Radio Shack.
  • How would English sound if it were phonetically consistent?
  • SMBC - Reverse Victorianism.
  • xkcd #2033 - Repair or replace on our current attitude towards tech fix-ability.
  • Tech:
    • Neil Postman - Five things we need to know about technological change (original PDF).
      1. All technological change is a trade-off. For every advantage a new technology offers, there is always a corresponding disadvantage.
      2. The advantages and disadvantages of new technologies are never distributed evenly among the population. This means that every new technology benefits some and harms others.
      3. Embedded in every technology there is a powerful idea, sometimes two or three powerful ideas. Every technology has a philosophy which is given expression in how the technology makes people use their minds, in what it makes us do with our bodies, in how it codifies the world, in which of our senses it amplifies, in which of our emotional and intellectual tendencies it disregards.
      4. Technological change is not additive; it is ecological. The consequences of technological change are always vast, often unpredictable and largely irreversible.
      5. Media tend to become mythic. Cars, planes, TV, movies, newspapers — they have achieved mythic status because they are perceived as gifts of nature, not as artifacts produced in a specific political and historical context.
    • xkcd#2030 - Voting software.
    • Good comment from HN user notatoad about Google AMP:

      AMP's innovation isn't a way to make pages fast. AMP is a way to sell other stakeholders on implementing technologies that make your website fast. All the stuff AMP does is stuff you could do yourself without the extra request to amp.js and the extra work to amp-ify your pages.

      But imagine you've got an advertising department that wants three different ad networks, a couple different managers that want to see stats from a couple different analytics platforms, and and the designer wants to load a font from fontsquirrel and another one from typekit and another one from google web fonts, and as a developer who wants to keep the site fast you have to fight them every single time they want to add something else that slows your site down. Having the same fight every time, with everybody else saying "oh, it's just one request. and this one is really critical" it's hard to keep fighting that fight.

      It's a lot easier to say "i can't do that, it doesn't work in AMP". If you can find a better way to convince large organizations that page load speed is a valuable metric, and more important that whatever other resource they want to load today, I'd love to hear it. But from what i've seen, AMP is the only thing that's had any success in tackling this problem.

    • There's Waldo is a robot that finds Waldo.
    • James Veitch: More adventures in replying to spam, thx bro.
    • Google data collection research, via DF.

      In “Google Data Collection,” Professor Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor of Computer Science at Vanderbilt University, catalogs how much data Google is collecting about consumers and their most personal habits across all of its products and how that data is being tied together. The key findings include:

      • A dormant, stationary Android phone (with the Chrome browser active in the background) communicated location information to Google 340 times during a 24-hour period, or at an average of 14 data communications per hour. In fact, location information constituted 35 percent of all the data samples sent to Google.

      • For comparison’s sake, a similar experiment found that on an iOS device with Safari but not Chrome, Google could not collect any appreciable data unless a user was interacting with the device. Moreover, an idle Android phone running the Chrome browser sends back to Google nearly fifty times as many data requests per hour as an idle iOS phone running Safari.

weekly reel August 05, 2018

Bonjour bonsoir, folks. This week's 🎶 is FAUXE.

I K H L A S by FAUXE

I K H L A S by FAUXE (bandcamp.com)

On the news,

weekly reel July 29, 2018

Hola, and music with Consider the Source and Happy Rhodes.

F**k it! we'll do it live - Volume 2 by Consider the Source

F**k it! we'll do it live - Volume 2 by Consider the Source (bandcamp.com)

World war trio (Parts II & III) by Consider the Source

World war trio (Parts II & III) by Consider the Source (bandcamp.com)

War Paint by Happy Rhodes

War Paint by Happy Rhodes (bandcamp.com)

Tidbits for this week: